No one is perect, and my manager, Garth, is no exception. What kind of person is he? He smells bad. His manner is quite grandiose and his skeleton is wide. When he meets the subordinate, he usually asks you for trouble. So he is a person without sympathy and bad temperament.
Garth, my manager, whose temperament is not so good. His voice is loud, incisive and grating when he is angry and snappish. Hearing he talks makes you feel uncomfortable. As long as he finds a slight problem, he behaved as if the sky was falling. He always admonishes to duplicate the similar topic. The sound is insipid and listening is always drowsy. We always feel relieved when he is making his conclusion.
Not only is his temperament not good, his sympathy is also poor. For instance, when someone is ill, other colleagues will show their care the warmth to the person. Only he does not care the ill person. On the surface, we are polite to him, but deep in our heart, we don't not appreciate him at all.
Although he has the shortcomings mentioned above, he has his merits. For example, he can be considerate sometimes. When the company holds the responsible conference every time, he can try to find solution to press down the matter. Although his main purpose it to protect the department's reputation, he indeed considers for the subordinate also. Another good point about him is he likes to enact the role of a director. When he directs the act in end-of-the-year performance. He speaks like a shopping salesman, also the mouth likes series bead to meet to say which without stopping. He enjoys the events and has fun with the subordiantes in same place. He laughs like a child. As a manager, he must be able to lead the scene. He is laborious completely.
In short, nobody is born perfect. I think the human nature is kind, but it is not perfect. If it has no meaning to deny a person because of his small shortcoming.
1 comment:
It seems you really have so much to say about your manager. You even wrote it down into an essay!
The people are not all perfect, also Garth, my manager, he is similarly.
-->No one is perect, and my manager, Garth, is no exception.
The people how he is a person?
-->What kind of person is he?
He is always smelly on face. His manner is quite grandiose and his skeleton is wide. When he meets the subordinate, he usually asks you for trouble.
-->smelly? Really? He smells bad?
So he is an asperity without the sympathy and the temperament is not good person;
-->he is a person without sympathy and bad temperament.
on the other hand, he has advantage that he could consider for the subordinate and he likes the act field's director well.
-->?? Can you rephrase this part? I don't understand this sentence.
Garth, my manager, who his temperament is not so good.
-->, whose temperament...
The sound is very big, incisive and grating when he is angry and snappish.
-->His voice is loud...
Also, let your ear is uncomfortable.
-->Hearing he talks makes you feel uncomfortable.
It is equally serious to like the day to fall down so long as he finds slightly wrong.
-->As long as he finds a slight problem, he behaved as if the sky was falling.
He always admonishes to duplicate the similar topic. The sound is insipid and listening is always drowsy. We always has the feeling of extricates when he is conclusion.
-->We always feel relieved when he is making his conclusion.
Not only his temperament is not good, but also his sympathy is poor too.
-->Not only is his temperamnet not good, his sympathy is also poor.
For instance, the subordinate is illness. They give to show loving careful and warm between the colleague.
-->when someone is ill, other colleagues will show their care the warmth to the person.
The politeness should be right on the surface for us, but the subordinate does not appreciate him from the heart in private.
-->? Can you rephrase this part?
-->On the surface, we are polite to him, but deep in our heart, we don't not appreciate him at all.
Although he has the above shortcoming, he has worth to propose the merit.
-->Although he has the shorcomings mentioned above, he has his merits.
For example, my manager could be able to consider for the subordinate.
-->he can be considerate sometimes.
The company holds the responsible conference every time. He can try to find solution to press down the matter.
-->When the company..., he...
Although he protect for the department's reputation, he indeed considers for the subordinate also.
-->...his main purpose it to protect the...
Another he likes the act field's director well. When he directs the act in company year's end activity. Speaking likes a shopping salesman, also the mouth likes series bead to meet to say which it has not stop.
-->Another good point about him is....
-->he likes to enact the role of a director.
-->end-of-the-year performance
-->He speaks like a...without stopping.
He is crazy with subordinate in same place.
-->He enjoys the events and has fun with the subordiantes...
He can send out similar to child's laughter.
-->He laughs like a child.
As a manager must be able to lead the scene. He is laborious completely.
-->As a manager, he must ...
In short, nobody is inborn perfect.
-->nobody is born perfect
I think the human nature is kindly, but it is not perfect.
--> kind
If it is only the small shortcoming to deny a person, that lost the meaning.
-->it has no meaning to deny a person because of his small shortcoming.
One good manager is not to have each kind merit for everyone.
-->?
Post a Comment